[Site map] Home > Enforcement policy role > Enforcement Manual App D
The NRC first assesses the significance of a violation by considering
Violations are either assigned a severity level, ranging from Severity Level I for the most significant to Severity Level IV for those of more than minor concern or are associated with issues assessed through the reactor oversight process's Significance Determination Process (SDP) that are assigned a color of green, white, yellow, or red based on the risk significance. Although minor violations must be corrected, given their limited risk significance, they are not subject to enforcement action and are not normally described in inspection reports.
Severity Level IV violations and violations related to green SDP findings are addressed within the non-escalated enforcement process and may either be cited in formal Notices of Violation (NOV) pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201 (which normally requires written responses) or treated as Non-Cited Violations (NCVs) (which are documented in inspection reports, but do not require written responses).
For power reactor licensees, an NCV will normally be issued unless
(Violations evaluated through the SDP are not subject to the third criterion.)
For all other licensees, the decision of whether an NOV or NCV will be issued depends on whether
Severity Level I, II, and III violations and violations related to white, yellow, or red SDP findings with actual consequences are addressed within the escalated enforcement process and are cited in NOVs and may be subject to civil penalties. The NRC imposes different levels of civil penalties based on a combination of the type of licensed activity, the type of licensee, the severity level of the violation, and
Violations related to white, yellow, or red SDP findings are also addressed within the escalated enforcement process and are cited in NOVs. Severity levels are not normally assigned and civil penalties are not normally imposed for these violations.
In recognition that the regulation of nuclear activities in many cases does not lend itself to a mechanistic treatment, the enforcement process provides flexibility through judgement and the ability to exercise discretion to tailor sanctions to the particular circumstances of an individual case, notwithstanding the outcome of the normal process.
Rev. 3 Apr 2007, 1800
© 2005-2007 David W. Drummond
Privacy policy
Accessibility policy
Webmaster
Disclaimer & copyright notice